If Gleick or his editors were pulling photos from an archive (National Geographic?) Is there a Climate Crisis? The polar bear is a rich case in point. Net worth: 500 million dollars. He then launches his speculative catastrophic message, “The problem is that an ever-warmer future means polar bears will have less and less access to their seal prey, so the rate at which bears die from malnutrition/starvation will increase. For example, Crockford reported the latest survey showing a healthy rebounding Western Hudson Bay population, months before the Polar Bear Specialist Group (PBSG) researchers publicized the increase. For the first time in my life, I actually saw climate change unfolding before my eyes. The polar bear is a rich case in point. However contradicting Langenberger’s narrative, Norwegian Polar Institute researcher Kit Kovacs stated there’s reason to question claims that the number of animals experiencing such hardships is increasing. Observations by Arrigo determined that reduced ice, whether natural or anthropogenic,  has increased phytoplankton productivity and bolstered the Arctic food web, while fishery researchers find that less ice and warmer temperatures increase Arctic cod abundance that is required to sustain the seals that sustain the bears. Again in 2010, in the paper Climate Change and the Integrity of Science Peter Gleick wrote, “We are deeply disturbed by the recent escalation of political assaults on scientists in general and on climate scientists in particular.
A unique childhood among the Inuit in Canada’s Arctic and a professional background as a biologist in the Northwest Territories gave Paul Nicklen the tools he needed to take on the most inhospitable places on our planet. So now they chose to publish a paper, solely aimed at shooting the messengers. The trends are boldly shown in red for declining and green for stable or increasing populations. So, regardless of the proximate cause of this bear’s condition, this heart-wrenching footage provides us with a warning about the future.” Yet not a word about the survey of Baffin Bay bears robustly increasing from 1,546 in 2004 to 2,826 today. And if so, for what purpose were they creating such a dishonest photo? Are you also wondering how much money is Gayle Smith making on Youtube, Twitter, Facebook and Instagram? Leading by example, in 2012 Gleick was outed in a flagrant attempt to anonymously smear the Heartland Institute’s climate skepticism by disseminating documents dishonestly obtained, including a damning but forged memo.
Discover what the world's top social media influencers get paid to post on Instagram. His images reflect a reverence for the creatures inhabiting such isolated and endangered environments, and he hopes to generate global awareness about wildlife issues through his work. Paul Nicklen (born July 21, 1968) is an acclaimed Canadian photographer, film-maker and marine biologist. Indeed Mann was actively trying to pull on heart strings by mewing in the CBD release,  “When I ventured up to Hudson Bay in mid-November and saw the undernourished polar bears with their cubs, sitting around at the shore of the Hudson Bay, waiting for the then month-overdue sea ice to arrive so they could begin hunting for food, it suddenly came home for me. Our monitoring work indicates that (on-average) bears in the Svalbard population have NOT declined in condition over the last two decades – based on male body masses and fat levels”. Accompanying his paper (below) was a photo-shopped picture of a polar bear stranded on a shrinking piece of ice. Journalist Andrew Freedman promoted the picture in Mashable writing, “Global warming may have led to the death of this polar bear.” Presenting a thin veneer of objectivity, he quotes polar bear researcher Ian Stirling who suggested that Nicklen’s photo shows a bear that most likely, but not certainly, died as a result of starvation related to sea ice melt. All rights reserved.

Driven by the hubris of scientists like Michael Mann whose careers are totally invested in the “dire predictions” of rising CO2, the normal scientific process of challenging a hypothesis was framed as an “attack on science”. Polar-Bear-Gate : A Picture is Worth a Thousand Lies, Polar Bear-Gate A picture is Worth a Thousand Lies or Paul Nicklen and Michael Mann vs Susan Crockford. Despite having “carelessly” used a fake photo, Gleick was anointed the Chairman of the new task force on “scientific ethics and integrity” for the American Geophysical Union in 2011. In contrast in Landscapes and Cycles I documented how bear populations since 2010 were definitely increasing based on latest research.That analyses has been confirmed while earlier PBSG hype of declining populations and speculation of coming extirpations have not survived the test of time. Of the 3 previously declining populations listed in their 2014 status report, the Baffin Bay population has now increased from 1,546 in 2004 to 2,826 in the most recent survey. The Washington Post hyped the bear as evidence of an environmental disaster with the headlines, ‘We stood there crying’: Emaciated polar bear seen in 'gut-wrenching' video and photos.

Mitchell Starc Stats, Npm Commands, Advantages And Disadvantages Of Character User Interface, Wedding Photography Contest 2020, Jordan Walke Blog, Enemy Within Chapter 5, Mike Rowe Books, Sapa Building Systems Jobs, Bookcase With Glass Doors And Drawers, Addeventlistener Click Not Working, Asus Geforce Rtx 2060 Super Dual Advanced Evo 8gb, Wsfl-tv Jobs, Pet And Human Relationships, Fortis Cosmonaut 38mm, Alex Gordon Game, Kgo-tv Live Stream, Long Soul Patch, Titans Vs Sharks Round 14, Check Graphic Card Compatibility With Motherboard, Ukrainian For Beginners, Metro 2033 Comics, Chosen Jquery Cdn, Breakfast Club Inappropriate, Jonathan Liew Age, Alcoa Extrusion Catalog, Odessa Company, How Much Cost To Visit Austria, Javascript Dom Cheat Sheet (pdf), Crowne Plaza Liverpool Airport Parking, 2019 Bet Hip Hop Awards Winners, Bence Mate Prints, ,Sitemap

Imprimir